View source for Talk:Fixed Bonus Types (3.5e Variant Rule)

== Ratings ==
{{Rating
|rater=Havvy
|rating=like
|reason=Normally I use the exact problem he described to great benefit to getting a +12 to all attacks for everybody in the party through spells while giving +9 AC to everybody in the party. This fixes that exploit, leading to actually being tactical being more useful.}}
{{Rating |rater=Fluffykittens
|rating=dislike
|reason=One of the few poorly written articles by the usually competent MS. This does not get rid of the problems of bonus stacking, it just changes what the problems are.
}}
{{Rating |rater=DanielDraco
|rating=dislike
|reason=This rule prevents a lot of cheese. It also throws a wrench in a whole lot of things that are not cheese at all. I see it as causing complications more than fixing problems.
}}
{{Rating |rater=Luigifan18
|rating=oppose
|reason=This gets rid of a lot of very useful bonus types, like insight and circumstance. Sure, some bonus types are useless, but this goes too far, and may result in more bonuses simply becoming typeless (allowing them to stack with anything). I agree with Draco, it causes more problems than it fixes.
}}
{{Rating |rater=Franken Kesey
|rating=oppose
|reason=This replaces one broken system, with something also broken.
}}

:This is community opposed, and needs to be sandboxed. --[[User:Franken Kesey|Franken Kesey]] ([[User talk:Franken Kesey|talk]]) 12:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

:: ...No. There's a difference between community opposed and community disliked. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 13:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

:::Sorry, misread. --[[User:Franken Kesey|Franken Kesey]] ([[User talk:Franken Kesey|talk]]) 13:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)