Difference between revisions of "Talk:Samurai's Salute (3.5e Maneuver)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with "== I like this but == Not having a cap on a level 2 concerns me, the damage potential is quite extreme. It is tempered by the fact that the enemy has to ignore you though. I p...") |
(→I like this but) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Not having a cap on a level 2 concerns me, the damage potential is quite extreme. It is tempered by the fact that the enemy has to ignore you though. I presume, but it should state, that the enemy is aware of the consequence for non-compliance. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 22:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC) | Not having a cap on a level 2 concerns me, the damage potential is quite extreme. It is tempered by the fact that the enemy has to ignore you though. I presume, but it should state, that the enemy is aware of the consequence for non-compliance. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 22:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Ja, it's useful because it actual offers some tanking potential to a class and discipline that pretty much lacks it. It sort of has to stand alone since the rest of the discipline is devoted to stabbing things in the face without tanking, but I'll add in that caveat. - [[User:ThunderGod Cid|TG Cid]] 02:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 20 July 2011
I like this but
Not having a cap on a level 2 concerns me, the damage potential is quite extreme. It is tempered by the fact that the enemy has to ignore you though. I presume, but it should state, that the enemy is aware of the consequence for non-compliance. -- Eiji-kun 22:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ja, it's useful because it actual offers some tanking potential to a class and discipline that pretty much lacks it. It sort of has to stand alone since the rest of the discipline is devoted to stabbing things in the face without tanking, but I'll add in that caveat. - TG Cid 02:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
