163
edits
Changes
→Ditching the SGT: reply
Ideasmith - We have 9 unquantifiable classes, and they are those that generally depend on a secondary class choice. They're only unquant because they could be any of the ranges, depending on the class choice made. As such, this probably wouldn't impact them at all. As for checking this against existing homebrew, this looks to be more a codification of balance range views in a checklist setup. I don't see many reassignments happening, and don't think we should be worried about it as long as we stick with a similar set of qualifiers. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 17:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
:Aarnott - I guess that makes sense. When someone adds a class to my campaign I generally look for the optimization they are going for. The build that makes that class really sing. I never expect a veteran player to goof-up their build or nerf themselves somehow. As a DM, I am always looking for the highest grade of power they class or item can offer. The best of the best. I don't worry when a pro picks a fighter build. I do worry when a noob picks a fighter build. So I guess it would make sense to look for the highest potential in an article when creating a Balance Point for it. If it falls short, then it's probably just player error or noob-ism. Thanks. ...Continue! --[[User:Jay Freedman|Jay Freedman]] 01:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
== Feats ==
