Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wandering Hero (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→This sentence contains a non sequitur: new section) |
(→This sentence contains a non sequitur) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
"He may abandon a quest which has become impossible without penalty, such as if his quest is to protect a princess, who subsequently dies. --Eiji-kun" --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | "He may abandon a quest which has become impossible without penalty, such as if his quest is to protect a princess, who subsequently dies. --Eiji-kun" --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I dun get it. (Sense Motive roll, natural 1) -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:58, 16 September 2014
So, what is stopping me from making absolutely nothing but miniscule Destinies, all or some of which would be towards a larger goal so I always have the bonuses? Why would I ever make a larger Destiny? The Dire Reverend 16:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because if you have an overarching goal you can rationalize anything as being part of your quest and still always get the bonuses. - TG Cid 18:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This sentence contains a non sequitur
"He may abandon a quest which has become impossible without penalty, such as if his quest is to protect a princess, who subsequently dies. --Eiji-kun" --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
