Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greater Bamf (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) (→Warmage acquisition delay) |
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux | ||
| + | |rating=dislike | ||
| + | |reason=Since this is a direct growth of bamf, it shouldn't be surprising that I dislike it as well. Twice the distance, twice the time, the same problematic options and scaling... nope. Not for it. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott | ||
|rating=like | |rating=like | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 3 October 2014
Ratings
|
Tarkisflux dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Since this is a direct growth of bamf, it shouldn't be surprising that I dislike it as well. Twice the distance, twice the time, the same problematic options and scaling... nope. Not for it. |
|
Aarnott likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Flavor: Well, as a greater version of another spell, this isn't a big deal. It isn't any better or worse, which is fine.
Mechanics: Looks good now |
- Also, line of effect can be worse than line of sight. Line of effect can't go through windows. The article should be something like:
- As Bamf, but with the following changes:
- You can use line of effect instead of line of sight to determine locations to teleport to
- You can teleport 20 ft. per caster level instead of 10 ft. per caster level
- etc.
- If greater bamf simply had twice the duration and twice the maximum range-per-teleport that bamf does, it would be a 4th-level spell. However, I feel that the extra options make it 5th-level instead. --Luigifan18 (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Warmage acquisition delay
How come? - Tarkisflux Talk 19:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Because greater bamf isn't a direct-attack spell. --Luigifan18 (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
