Difference between revisions of "Talk:5e Homebrew"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) |
T.G. Oskar (talk | contribs) (→Subpages: - Replying with opinion) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Instead of being like base and prestige and npc, perhaps more like how General and non-General feats used to work, with two tables on the same page. I generally prefer pages to be Control+F friendly. | :Instead of being like base and prestige and npc, perhaps more like how General and non-General feats used to work, with two tables on the same page. I generally prefer pages to be Control+F friendly. | ||
:And the subs probably need their own pages if people ever want to make subraces for existing races. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 07:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | :And the subs probably need their own pages if people ever want to make subraces for existing races. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 07:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Judging by how small is the subrace content, they could be part of the races description. Subclasses are another monster, since they can range from being small (Berserker Path for the Barbarian) to immense (the Wizard's Schools). The class description is likewise huge; thus, the most efficient way to handle subclasses is to give them their own pages, and to link each subclass to the class page. [[User:T.G. Oskar|T.G. Oskar]] ([[User talk:T.G. Oskar|talk]]) 08:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:18, 5 October 2014
Subpages
So... 5e has classes and subclasses, races and subraces. We have space for pages for classes and races already, but that can change. Sort of torn between sticking sub things on the relevant non-sub pages, or making a new page for the subs. But if the subs get their own pages, should they link from here or from the non-sub pages, or should both the sub and non-sub pages have an intermediate page that links to here (like base and prestige and npc classes have in 3.5e) and what would that page be called (or the non-sub pages if they get a new name instead)?
Yes, I'm almost certainly overthinking this. So I'm dumping it here and hoping for someone to come and save me from my brain. - Tarkisflux Talk 07:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Instead of being like base and prestige and npc, perhaps more like how General and non-General feats used to work, with two tables on the same page. I generally prefer pages to be Control+F friendly.
- And the subs probably need their own pages if people ever want to make subraces for existing races. --Foxwarrior (talk) 07:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Judging by how small is the subrace content, they could be part of the races description. Subclasses are another monster, since they can range from being small (Berserker Path for the Barbarian) to immense (the Wizard's Schools). The class description is likewise huge; thus, the most efficient way to handle subclasses is to give them their own pages, and to link each subclass to the class page. T.G. Oskar (talk) 08:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)