Difference between revisions of "Talk:Siege Axe (3.5e Equipment)"
(→Hey IP) |
m |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
As is, it's without limit. What stops me from taking a -9000000000000000000000000000000000000001 penalty to AC for massive damage? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 02:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | As is, it's without limit. What stops me from taking a -9000000000000000000000000000000000000001 penalty to AC for massive damage? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 02:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :"Any proficient wielder may take a penalty to his Armor Class that is less than or equal to half his base attack bonus (rounded up), and gain that penalty as a bonus to the damage of his attacks for the round." --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] ([[User talk:Sulacu|talk]]) 03:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:23, 27 June 2015
Hey IP
Hello. I notice you keep changing the price to 200 gp. Unfortunately, if you're not the author you shouldn't make mechanical changes to articles like this (grammar and typo changes are fine). Whenever you disagree with an article's contents, try this talk page here and try to contact the author. Many of our authors are active, and will reply within a few days. Afterwards if there is no reply after a while, you can try and change things since you made an effort to try and contact them.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
NI Damage
"When the wielder induces a penalty on his Armor Class, he instead gains twice the penalty to his damage"
As is, it's without limit. What stops me from taking a -9000000000000000000000000000000000000001 penalty to AC for massive damage? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 02:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)