Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tough Muscle (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Doublechecking == Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your HD + Con + Str? Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- ~~~~")
 
(Added rating.)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Doublechecking ==
+
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Leziad
 +
|rating=like
 +
|reason=An interesting variant on toughness, on one hand it better because it grant more hit point. On the other it require an investment to be made worthwhile.
  
Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your HD + Con + Str?  Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
+
However I think it should count as toughness imo, if you do I will change my rating to a favor.
 +
}}== Doublechecking ==
 +
 
 +
Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your Con + Str ''per'' HD?  Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
:Right now, your hp is as normal plus Strength. I might change that later if I think it's too underpowered for Moderate balance. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 20:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::That's not much better than [[SRD:Toughness]] in most cases, and that's not saying much... - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  21:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:::Well, that's why I put it at Moderate balance. It certainly isn't anything higher. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 00:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::::You want Low then, Toughness is the archetypal trap feat/Low feat. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 00:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Btw ==
 +
 
 +
Does this count as Toughness for pre-reqs? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 15:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 +
:I'm kinda on the fence about that. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 01:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
:: It should. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 18:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:25, 15 July 2016

Ratings[edit]

RatedLike.png Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
An interesting variant on toughness, on one hand it better because it grant more hit point. On the other it require an investment to be made worthwhile.

However I think it should count as toughness imo, if you do I will change my rating to a favor.

Doublechecking

Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your Con + Str per HD? Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Right now, your hp is as normal plus Strength. I might change that later if I think it's too underpowered for Moderate balance. --Luigifan18 (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
That's not much better than SRD:Toughness in most cases, and that's not saying much... - Tarkisflux Talk 21:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, that's why I put it at Moderate balance. It certainly isn't anything higher. --Luigifan18 (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
You want Low then, Toughness is the archetypal trap feat/Low feat. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Btw[edit]

Does this count as Toughness for pre-reqs? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 15:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm kinda on the fence about that. --Luigifan18 (talk) 01:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
It should. --Leziad (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)