Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tough Muscle (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) (→Doublechecking) |
(Added rating.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Doublechecking == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Leziad | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=An interesting variant on toughness, on one hand it better because it grant more hit point. On the other it require an investment to be made worthwhile. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However I think it should count as toughness imo, if you do I will change my rating to a favor. | ||
| + | }}== Doublechecking == | ||
Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your Con + Str ''per'' HD? Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your Con + Str ''per'' HD? Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 11: | ||
::That's not much better than [[SRD:Toughness]] in most cases, and that's not saying much... - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 21:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ::That's not much better than [[SRD:Toughness]] in most cases, and that's not saying much... - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 21:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
:::Well, that's why I put it at Moderate balance. It certainly isn't anything higher. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 00:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | :::Well, that's why I put it at Moderate balance. It certainly isn't anything higher. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 00:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::You want Low then, Toughness is the archetypal trap feat/Low feat. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 00:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Btw == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does this count as Toughness for pre-reqs? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 15:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I'm kinda on the fence about that. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 01:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: It should. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 18:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:25, 15 July 2016
Ratings[edit]
|
Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| An interesting variant on toughness, on one hand it better because it grant more hit point. On the other it require an investment to be made worthwhile.
However I think it should count as toughness imo, if you do I will change my rating to a favor. |
Doublechecking
Does that mean your Hp is as normal + Str, or your Con + Str per HD? Looks like the former, but wanted to be sure. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Right now, your hp is as normal plus Strength. I might change that later if I think it's too underpowered for Moderate balance. --Luigifan18 (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's not much better than SRD:Toughness in most cases, and that's not saying much... - Tarkisflux Talk 21:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Well, that's why I put it at Moderate balance. It certainly isn't anything higher. --Luigifan18 (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Btw[edit]
Does this count as Toughness for pre-reqs? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 15:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm kinda on the fence about that. --Luigifan18 (talk) 01:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
