Difference between revisions of "Talk:Argent Aegis (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
 
(Ratings)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
{{Rating |rater=Spanambula
+
{{Rating |rater=Spanambula |block=NewVersion
 
|rating=dislike
 
|rating=dislike
 
|reason=This is interesting, and a vastly powered up version of my own [[Skin_of_the_Construct,_Variant_(3.5e_Feat)|skin of the construct variant]] feat, but sadly it's way overpowered, even for a VH feat.  
 
|reason=This is interesting, and a vastly powered up version of my own [[Skin_of_the_Construct,_Variant_(3.5e_Feat)|skin of the construct variant]] feat, but sadly it's way overpowered, even for a VH feat.  
 
It's a host of really great benefits and powers all wrapped into one without even having to expend your psionic focus or pay additional power points.
 
It's a host of really great benefits and powers all wrapped into one without even having to expend your psionic focus or pay additional power points.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
I have made revisions to aid in clear understanding of the benefits and limitations of the feat, and added a minor penalty. I believe incomplete understanding of the feat contributed to the previous rating. [[User:Elohim|Elohim]] ([[User talk:Elohim|talk]]) 13:24, 12 January 2019 (MST)

Latest revision as of 20:24, 12 January 2019

Ratings[edit]

Blocked
RatedDislike.png
Rating
Spanambula dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
This rating refers to a substantially different version of the article, or concerns mentioned in it have already been addressed.
This is interesting, and a vastly powered up version of my own skin of the construct variant feat, but sadly it's way overpowered, even for a VH feat.

It's a host of really great benefits and powers all wrapped into one without even having to expend your psionic focus or pay additional power points.


I have made revisions to aid in clear understanding of the benefits and limitations of the feat, and added a minor penalty. I believe incomplete understanding of the feat contributed to the previous rating. Elohim (talk) 13:24, 12 January 2019 (MST)