Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ultima (3.5e Epic Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
(Added rating.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
+ | {{Rating |rater=Sunwitch | ||
+ | |rating=dislike | ||
+ | |reason=What Fox said, mostly. I also don't like the idea of high-level Final Fantasy stuff being considered off the legible D&D power scale - it shouldn't be hard to place "extremely big AoE damage thing with unique damage qualities" as a level 8 spell or even lower. | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
|rating=dislike | |rating=dislike |
Latest revision as of 06:11, 19 November 2021
Ratings[edit]
Sunwitch dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. | |
---|---|
What Fox said, mostly. I also don't like the idea of high-level Final Fantasy stuff being considered off the legible D&D power scale - it shouldn't be hard to place "extremely big AoE damage thing with unique damage qualities" as a level 8 spell or even lower. |
Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. | |
---|---|
The price is absurdly high, and the effect is quite unremarkable.
Epic spells are sometimes pretty fun, in a "look how I can break this haphazardly designed system" sort of way, and sometimes fun in a "look how extreme I can make a spell" sort of way, but this is just a big fireball with an unreachable cost. |