Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ultima (3.5e Epic Spell)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
 
(Added rating.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Sunwitch
 +
|rating=dislike
 +
|reason=What Fox said, mostly. I also don't like the idea of high-level Final Fantasy stuff being considered off the legible D&D power scale - it shouldn't be hard to place "extremely big AoE damage thing with unique damage qualities" as a level 8 spell or even lower.
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior
 
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior
 
|rating=dislike
 
|rating=dislike

Latest revision as of 06:11, 19 November 2021

Ratings[edit]

RatedDislike.png Sunwitch dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
What Fox said, mostly. I also don't like the idea of high-level Final Fantasy stuff being considered off the legible D&D power scale - it shouldn't be hard to place "extremely big AoE damage thing with unique damage qualities" as a level 8 spell or even lower.
RatedDislike.png Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
The price is absurdly high, and the effect is quite unremarkable.

Epic spells are sometimes pretty fun, in a "look how I can break this haphazardly designed system" sort of way, and sometimes fun in a "look how extreme I can make a spell" sort of way, but this is just a big fireball with an unreachable cost.

DislikedSunwitch + and Foxwarrior +