Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eye of the Obyrith (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == And Again == | + | == Ratings == |
+ | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
+ | |rating=neutral | ||
+ | |reason=Though I'm rating this neutral, it's on the lower end of the scale. It's entirely due to disagreements about price. The item itself, and the effects, are solid however. | ||
+ | }}== And Again == | ||
See the other talk pages, too cheap for constant true seeing, completely outpacing other items, good, fair priced ones. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 17:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC) | See the other talk pages, too cheap for constant true seeing, completely outpacing other items, good, fair priced ones. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] 17:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:55, 15 February 2015
Ratings[edit]
Eiji-kun is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. | |
---|---|
Though I'm rating this neutral, it's on the lower end of the scale. It's entirely due to disagreements about price. The item itself, and the effects, are solid however. |
And Again
See the other talk pages, too cheap for constant true seeing, completely outpacing other items, good, fair priced ones. -- Eiji-kun 17:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Firstly, as we have previously established on the talk page for the bar-lgura arm, your definition of 'good' and 'fair-priced' leave a whole lot to be desired. As a result, I'm not sure your criticism is valid even from that standpoint.
- Secondly, this is an item balanced for a 12th level character. All of the above is completely in-line with what a 12th level character, given the wizard level of balance, can do. The price given for it is a reasonable fraction of the total wealth by level for a 12th level character (11%, to be exact), and if we examine it in terms of wealth growth between 11th level and 12th level, it's about 45% of that. Combined with the fact that items in general are priced in a retarded fashion, and that this item benefits non-magic guys more than magic ones, your objections seem strange in the extreme. - MisterSinister 21:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)