Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pathfinder (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) (→Ratings: The funny thing is, anti-battlefield control isn't even its intended use.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|reason=This looks pretty solid, providing a bunch of counters against battlefield control. The 19 rank one is worded a little funny, but I understand what you mean and it's useful. The feat seems Moderate-to-High, and I'm leading moderate. Bretty gud. | |reason=This looks pretty solid, providing a bunch of counters against battlefield control. The 19 rank one is worded a little funny, but I understand what you mean and it's useful. The feat seems Moderate-to-High, and I'm leading moderate. Bretty gud. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The funny thing is, anti-battlefield control isn't even its intended use. It's all in the name; it's a feat for knowing where you're going. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 05:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 22 November 2015
Ratings[edit]
|
Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| This looks pretty solid, providing a bunch of counters against battlefield control. The 19 rank one is worded a little funny, but I understand what you mean and it's useful. The feat seems Moderate-to-High, and I'm leading moderate. Bretty gud. |
The funny thing is, anti-battlefield control isn't even its intended use. It's all in the name; it's a feat for knowing where you're going. --Luigifan18 (talk) 05:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
