Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aarnott"
m (→Ratings) |
The Badger (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::Can I ask for a re-rating of [[Sociopath (3.5e Feat)|Sociopath]]? --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 01:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC) | ::Can I ask for a re-rating of [[Sociopath (3.5e Feat)|Sociopath]]? --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 01:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Seriously? == | ||
| + | Come on, what are you doing? Aren't there enough other reasons for you guys to make fun of us? Look, I'm overweight, wear glasses, and just got friend-zoned by a girl I though I was settling for. Make fun of me for any of those things. Don't try and stop the slightest twinge of progress we've been able to manage. Besides, do you really think one small success is suddenly going to turn GD into a rational and reasoning person? Feel free to come to our wiki and laugh at us (God knows, I come to your wiki and stare longingly at the recent change log that is filled with constructive edits and cooperation); just, don't get in our way. Besides, once you break the fourth wall, it won't be as fun anymore. We all know that. --[[User:The Badger|The Badger]] 02:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:38, 31 August 2011
Call to Arms!
I know you don't comment on other users much. With what little time you have prioritised to this wiki, I would much appreciate even a currsary glance of either my Sith/ Jedi (3.5e Class), Uongo-mijusi (3.5e Race), or Viveka Spectre (3.5e Prestige Class). Thank you for being the fulcrum of green dragons downfall - and any time on the above pages. --Franken Kesey 00:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay
Sorry it took me a month to get back to you on this. Looks like that got in while I was finishing up my recent move, and I didn't see it. Only saw it at all because I decided to look over my watchlist for the last couple of months. Anyway, if you're still interested in the idea, my thoughts are there. - Tarkisflux Talk 19:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Ratings
Since you like using the rating box in the neither format, I went and added that as an option (so it doesn't leave the annoying directions message). Just do |rating=neither and you should be good. - Tarkisflux Talk 07:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I find it useful to put down an actual rating of "neither" so that I know that I have already rated the article if I look at it again. Right now I'm picking random pages and rating whatever comes up. --Aarnott 16:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Seriously?
Come on, what are you doing? Aren't there enough other reasons for you guys to make fun of us? Look, I'm overweight, wear glasses, and just got friend-zoned by a girl I though I was settling for. Make fun of me for any of those things. Don't try and stop the slightest twinge of progress we've been able to manage. Besides, do you really think one small success is suddenly going to turn GD into a rational and reasoning person? Feel free to come to our wiki and laugh at us (God knows, I come to your wiki and stare longingly at the recent change log that is filled with constructive edits and cooperation); just, don't get in our way. Besides, once you break the fourth wall, it won't be as fun anymore. We all know that. --The Badger 02:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
