Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alchemist (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(awesome, but will it be finished soon?) |
(→Repetition) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| − | I got my GM to approve this, because I really love the concept. It just looks like a lot of fun! However... I'm going to have to add to your write up significantly to make it playable. Also, bombs require area effect of some kind, but you don't give the alchemist any on base spell list until fireball, and only a few low level ones in the "secrets." Just a recommendation. | + | I got my GM to approve this, because I really love the concept. It just looks like a lot of fun! However... I'm going to have to add to |
| + | your write up significantly to make it playable. Also, bombs require area effect of some kind, but you don't give the alchemist any | ||
| + | on base spell list until fireball, and only a few low level ones in the "secrets." Just a recommendation. | ||
Revision as of 05:44, 1 July 2012
Repetition
That makes the third (or sixth, if you count prestige classes) alchemist this week. We just have to hope no more get put on for a while, or things will get very silly. --Foxwarrior 07:09, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
I got my GM to approve this, because I really love the concept. It just looks like a lot of fun! However... I'm going to have to add to
your write up significantly to make it playable. Also, bombs require area effect of some kind, but you don't give the alchemist any on base spell list until fireball, and only a few low level ones in the "secrets." Just a recommendation.
