Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greater Bamf (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Warmage acquisition delay: new section) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::If ''greater bamf'' simply had twice the duration and twice the maximum range-per-teleport that ''bamf'' does, it would be a 4th-level spell. However, I feel that the extra options make it 5th-level instead. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 18:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ::If ''greater bamf'' simply had twice the duration and twice the maximum range-per-teleport that ''bamf'' does, it would be a 4th-level spell. However, I feel that the extra options make it 5th-level instead. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 18:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Warmage acquisition delay == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How come? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 19:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 18 March 2014
Ratings
|
Aarnott likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Flavor: Well, as a greater version of another spell, this isn't a big deal. It isn't any better or worse, which is fine.
Mechanics: Looks good now |
- Also, line of effect can be worse than line of sight. Line of effect can't go through windows. The article should be something like:
- As Bamf, but with the following changes:
- You can use line of effect instead of line of sight to determine locations to teleport to
- You can teleport 20 ft. per caster level instead of 10 ft. per caster level
- etc.
- If greater bamf simply had twice the duration and twice the maximum range-per-teleport that bamf does, it would be a 4th-level spell. However, I feel that the extra options make it 5th-level instead. --Luigifan18 (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Warmage acquisition delay
How come? - Tarkisflux Talk 19:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
