Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nope (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
(EDIT) AND WHY IS IT DIVINATION!? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 23:01, 4 September 2017 (MDT) | (EDIT) AND WHY IS IT DIVINATION!? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 23:01, 4 September 2017 (MDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Judging by your definition of intimately familiar, you could use it as a way to get 150 rounds of buffing and prep and then teleport exactly where you left, ready to go. Still losing? Pull out a second scroll of it next time you want to give the party some magic 'roids. Also, it's divination because you SEE the DM throw the table at you when you use it. - [[User:Aeturo|Aeturo]] ([[User talk:Aeturo|talk]]) 10:22, 5 September 2017 (MDT) |
Revision as of 16:22, 5 September 2017
I get it but...
Even if the formatting is fixed, this spell is somewhat of a stinker. I see it trying to balance things being all like "you waste all your expendables", but not everyone has expendables. The rogue with UMD and a scroll of this with his part of warlocks and initiators doesn't particularly care. Heck make it a warlock with UMD (they have it) and they can spend 15 minutes buffing, drinking potions, brewing coffee, and who else knows. NOPE. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2017 (MDT)
(EDIT) AND WHY IS IT DIVINATION!? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2017 (MDT)
- Judging by your definition of intimately familiar, you could use it as a way to get 150 rounds of buffing and prep and then teleport exactly where you left, ready to go. Still losing? Pull out a second scroll of it next time you want to give the party some magic 'roids. Also, it's divination because you SEE the DM throw the table at you when you use it. - Aeturo (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2017 (MDT)