Difference between revisions of "Talk:Staff Fighting Monk (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with "Eiji, is there a reason why this ACF keeps the standard monk's exotic weapon proficiencies rather that providing proficiency with exotic staffs? -Amdillae ([...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Eiji, is there a reason why this ACF keeps the standard monk's exotic weapon proficiencies rather that providing proficiency with exotic staffs? | Eiji, is there a reason why this ACF keeps the standard monk's exotic weapon proficiencies rather that providing proficiency with exotic staffs? | ||
[[User:Amdillae|-Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 9:07 23 January 2018 (UTC) | [[User:Amdillae|-Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 9:07 23 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Its generally assumed you're just using a quarterstaff, which you already are proficient in. I could see you trading out monk exotics in favor of exotic quarterstaff weapons. Such a trade is undoubtedly an upgrade though. Consider this support for an unofficial Alternate-Alternate Class Feature. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 01:09, 23 January 2018 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 08:09, 23 January 2018
Eiji, is there a reason why this ACF keeps the standard monk's exotic weapon proficiencies rather that providing proficiency with exotic staffs? -Amdillae (talk) 9:07 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Its generally assumed you're just using a quarterstaff, which you already are proficient in. I could see you trading out monk exotics in favor of exotic quarterstaff weapons. Such a trade is undoubtedly an upgrade though. Consider this support for an unofficial Alternate-Alternate Class Feature. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 01:09, 23 January 2018 (MST)
