Difference between revisions of "SRD talk:Feats"
(→List of Incorrectly Labeled and/or Templated Feats: column 2 feats (template fixes, leadership - greater psionic shot)) |
(→List of Incorrectly Labeled and/or Templated Feats: more column 2 feats, i think im done fixing this for the day) |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
[[SRD:Righteous Strike]] | [[SRD:Righteous Strike]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 136: | Line 130: | ||
[[SRD:Exotic Weapon Proficiency]] | [[SRD:Exotic Weapon Proficiency]] | ||
+ | |||
====Column 2 Feats==== | ====Column 2 Feats==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[SRD:Jack of All Trades]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[SRD:Lasting Inspiration]] | ||
[[SRD:Leadership]] | [[SRD:Leadership]] | ||
Line 156: | Line 155: | ||
: [[SRD:Greater Psionic Shot]] | : [[SRD:Greater Psionic Shot]] | ||
+ | |||
====Column 2 Feats (Fighter)==== | ====Column 2 Feats (Fighter)==== |
Revision as of 21:07, 13 August 2019
Some of these feats, such as Psionic Talent, have an odd formatting. Is this intentional? --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 19:37, 11 August 2019 (MDT)
- I don't know if it's intentional; but Psionic Talent (as you pointed out) doesn't use the 3.5e Feat template, which is why it looks weirds. You can see the difference by checking the source on something like Ability Focus. We'll probably fix this. Thanks for pointing this out, my dude. --TK-Squared (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
- No problem. It also looks like some fighter feats are missing the blurb about the fighter being able to take it as a bonus feat (unless Flyby Attack really isn't a bonus fighter feat) or are labeled as general feats and not fighter feats (some fighter feats have the fighter category and not the general category, idk if that was an actual feat category in the SRD or not). --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 05:42, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
List of Incorrectly Labeled and/or Templated Feats
Here's the list of all feats that have a bad template, aren't correct with 3.0 being updated to 3.5, and/or are fighter bonus feats that are not marked as in the fighter feat category on their article page. --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
Broken Feat Category Links
Column 1
SRD:Disguise Spell ("Music" feat category error)
Column 3
SRD:Spell Mastery (link to feat category page that doesn't exist)
Wrong/Incorrect Template
Column 1
Column 2
Feats edited/fixed
Column 1 Feats
Column 1 Feats (Fighter)
SRD:Blind-Fight (missing new line before fighter feat text)
- SRD:Shot on the Run (also should this be listed as a feat building off of SRD:Point Blank Shot instead?)
Column 2 Feats
SRD:Penetrate Damage Reduction
Column 2 Feats (Fighter)
Column 3 feats
SRD:Epic Weapon Focus (not sure if this is a bonus epic fighter feat or not)
Column 3 feats (Fighter)
Other Stuff
I put SRD: in front of each feat so the link works correctly without having to type every feat name twice. If someone ever decides to make redirects for all the feats, they could use this list and CTRL+H away the SRD: text and look at the preview to see which ones don't have redirects to the feat page. There are redirects for some feats, but not all of them, which is understandable for ones that probably don't get used much.--MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
I think Colossal Wild Shape should be listed as a feat under Gargantuan Wild Shape unless if there's another way to wild shape into a gargantuan creature. --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2019 (MDT)
Would it be helpful if there was also a "required for" column for each feat that's used as a requirement for other feats, to help in cases like Shot on the Run where it requires feats from different feat trees? --MadmanFromSpace (talk) 11:27, 12 August 2019 (MDT)