Talk:Inescapable Embrace (3.5e Maneuver)

Ratings

	DanielDraco opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	This throws grapples off the RNG. Further, it beefs up an already incredibly beefy feat. And finally, even with the jocular and coy phrasing, I'm somewhat disturbed by the fact that you not only specified the possibility for rape, but actually attached mechanical significance to it.

ThunderGod Cid is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.

So, not only does this defy some normal conventions of maneuvers by having ability score prerequisites and such, but it's also something of a text wall. Fluff is nice and all, but this toes the line between between having fluff and having just too much text, like the whole bit about it getting the Evil descriptor when the perform an unspecified act. In short, redundant text should, in my opinion, be stricken for a more concise description. Essentially, this stance could be the first paragraph alone, and while the feat synergy is nice it could also be crunched down to less text.

...The unspecified act is rape. Now do you see why it's Evil?!? --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)