User talk:God Arco

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Revision as of 18:16, 11 June 2012 by God Arco (talk | contribs) (Making a Story Alchemist)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Lets Talk Powers[edit]

I beilive that powers are ok as long as you have a DM that would allow homebrew types and a story not so to the point.The power must be one of the things that you should be able to base as powerful not for the story kind of the thing and allow complexitys of changes and power adjustment of diffent kinds but DM's latly i have worked with take to much to heart and kill creativity in new homebrews and are to godly attched to there books like it werethe koran

Just Saying Preemptively[edit]

Please, please use a spellchecker and the like if you plan on posting stuff. It will save you a lot of grief from other Wiki people in the future. - TG Cid 01:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I am who I am[edit]

I will spell lik an ass only for the sake o proving a point no offence in anyway I would rather it be incorrect that anything else for othinintisity purpases yes I am a bad speller but I do take your suggestion into mind and thank you

Stop being so obsessed about being who you are when you could be someone better instead. --Foxwarrior 17:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I am good i will be who i am for i am awesome as it does supose though keep in mind non of you so far have given me a chance to be heard so what is there to even to judge but a couple of sentaces were as you may take in my charactor once i have given you my notes ideas and work i have done to give me a chance

Ok, I'm pretty supportive of people being who they are and writing in the style they want (so long as the material is site appropriate), even when those styles get in the way of communication, but in your case I think a change might be well advised. It's really hard to take your offer and quality claims seriously when I have to put effort into parsing the offer in the first place. The lack of punctuation in your sentences is what really does it. You can write your comments in all lower caps and spell them poorly if you want to and I don't care. It's not a good indicator, but I could get past it to check out your work. If I can't tell where a thought ends and begins because of the lack of punctuation cues, and I have to try to parse both language and thoughts in a sentence, it's a deal breaker for your work in general. I might be alone in that, but I suspect otherwise. - Tarkisflux Talk 21:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Well i am really used to wrighting in diffrent languages but english is my first langage but how ever there is a chance here to do so good for everyone ask around and see what people think and i will attempt to fix my wrightings though i care not what you how i write but i can if my material is good

Then put up some material or a link to existing material. All I have now is ramblings that I have no reason to give the benefit of the doubt, and several reasons to actively doubt. - Tarkisflux Talk 22:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Sir, English is not my first language, but while I sometimes ignore a few grammatical points for the sake of expediency, I tend to write properly. English, IMO, is simpler in terms of how you can write it. I could have the excuse that I don't know how to write it properly, but I do write English properly. This isn't (look, a contraction!) a critique of your work, but rather advice to, at least, fix your writing a bit. I find writing expediently and correctly the least bit troublesome, so I feel there's no excuse for bad writing at all, particularly if it's not riddled with arcane grammatical rules regarding how to place an accent (you mention you write in different languages; care to tell which of those?).
Otherwise, people WILL think your stuff is bad. After all; "defective language, defective thinking". Please consider this a friendly PSA from a newbie at this Wiki. T.G. Oskar 22:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I have learned how to wright in Celtic, japanese,Chinese ,and other symbolistic languages as well as something know as helinistic wrighting but i will send up some work for you to see but also i have a wrighting disability dyslexia

The first thing you should have done, then, was to mention that you have Dyslexia. That would have saved a lot of problems, and with some effort you can still do a good effort. T.G. Oskar 23:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

sorry I do have some organiztional issuess as well but all the same i am only trying to shar things ot for the effort of instant gradifiction but for some veiwers would could provide constructive critasisam with a balance of popular foucus and idea chain to give both me and other a way to interact and expand are ever defining world in which always needs tuning

Alchemists?[edit]

Can someone provide so elements to start with for an alchemist build.I was thinking a new class but if you have some sub class stats that would be great.I also have another account called Death King if you want to look at that I only made it because of ggogle chrome will not let me log into his account.

Elements for an alchemist: Osmium, Plutonium, Argon, Mithral, Francium, Deep Crystal, Technetium, Tungsten, Adamantine, Calcium. If what you actually wanted was an alchemist class that already exists, just look in a list of classes and use Control+F. --Foxwarrior 17:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Awewsome thankz. :-)
You know what, there's a more unusual set of elements one could use: Setting, Narrative, Characters, Challenges, Introduction, Climax, Dénouement. We don't have any Plot Alchemists yet. --Foxwarrior 17:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

So a story alchamist kinda like a time lord mixed with a ritual based control of story wrighting?I will work on it...

Story Alchemist[edit]

Story Alchemist[edit]

A being of control and power he weilds the great power of story ,but at a cost to him.As great power come so does great responiblity.

Making a Story Alchemist[edit]

Abilities:Intelligence is there main foucus they train and live in there story they make.they use abilities such as edit to cut out things in time or in there mind, there story.They are well intaped into arcana and its use as well as there story telling is considered reiligion based.Being a story teller gives them stregths in bluffs, diplomicys, and intimidate.There perception skill are amazing in many ways.

Races:Must be a race taped into magic that is powerful and livly in there speach and in personalitys.They can be evil readers but must be vocaly capabley.

Alighment:Any ,but this effects what powers they may have so it all depends but can not be totaly nutral.

Starting age:any age