Property talk:Class Ability Progression

Full was a better call Surgo. Do you want to stick with moderate and poor for the other two still, or something more evocative like two-thirds and one-third? Or even just replace the progression with a maximum spell level number? I don't particularly like either of those more, just thinking aloud. - TarkisFlux 15:56, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

When talking about classes, people usually refer to them as "full spellcasting" (Loremaster), "separate spellcasting" (Assassin), "no spellcasting", or "partial spellcasting" (anything that isn't the other three). Why not use that as the property values? ie: full, separate, partial, none. --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 16:52, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Where do the Bard and Ranger fall in that terminology? - TarkisFlux 17:14, September 25, 2009 (UTC)