Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monk Weapon Focus (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
DanielDraco (talk | contribs) (→Question) |
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) m (* Favor */ havvy took my place on the RC and has now rated this, so my half-assed one is coming off) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|points=1 | |points=1 | ||
|reason=I always thought that this should be the case, and here it is. Now monks can wield adamantine staffs and use their full damage.}} | |reason=I always thought that this should be the case, and here it is. Now monks can wield adamantine staffs and use their full damage.}} | ||
| − | |||
{{RC Favor |rater=TK-Squared |points=1|reason=Monks suck a little less.}} | {{RC Favor |rater=TK-Squared |points=1|reason=Monks suck a little less.}} | ||
{{RC Favor | {{RC Favor | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 8 January 2011
Favor
Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor
Question
Does this apply when dual wielding Sai? 2d10 sai in each hand at level 20? It is a bit sary.--Sergejsvk 15:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- No worse that one weapon with this feat + unarmed strike, a scorpion kama/no feat + unarmed strike, or two scorpion kamas. This power was purchasable via gold anyway. But to answer, yes, 2d10 for each sai. -- Eiji Hyrule 16:12, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Why is this a tagged as a fighter feat (not balance level, feat type)? --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 20:11, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- It seemed a suitable feat for multiclass fighter/monk types to take, being synergistic with the weapon focus tree. -- Eiji Hyrule 13:26, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- On a related note, why is this tagged as a fighter feat (not feat type, balance level)? --DanielDraco 16:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Facts about "Monk Weapon Focus (3.5e Feat)"
| Favored | Ghostwheel + |
| Liked | DanielDraco +, Havvy + and Undead Knave + |
| UncountedRating | TK-Squared + |
