Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monk Weapon Focus (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Undead Knave (talk | contribs) (→Favor) |
(→Favor: Wish granted, UK.) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|rating=neither | |rating=neither | ||
|reason=This feat does help the Monk by adding in the option for magic weapons, but it's kind of bland. I'd bump it up to a Like if this either did a little more or had some flavor text.}} | |reason=This feat does help the Monk by adding in the option for magic weapons, but it's kind of bland. I'd bump it up to a Like if this either did a little more or had some flavor text.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Wish granted. | ||
== Question == | == Question == | ||
Revision as of 07:31, 26 November 2011
Favor
|
Undead_Knave is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| This feat does help the Monk by adding in the option for magic weapons, but it's kind of bland. I'd bump it up to a Like if this either did a little more or had some flavor text. |
- Wish granted.
Question
Does this apply when dual wielding Sai? 2d10 sai in each hand at level 20? It is a bit sary.--Sergejsvk 15:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- No worse that one weapon with this feat + unarmed strike, a scorpion kama/no feat + unarmed strike, or two scorpion kamas. This power was purchasable via gold anyway. But to answer, yes, 2d10 for each sai. -- Eiji Hyrule 16:12, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Why is this a tagged as a fighter feat (not balance level, feat type)? --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 20:11, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
- It seemed a suitable feat for multiclass fighter/monk types to take, being synergistic with the weapon focus tree. -- Eiji Hyrule 13:26, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
- On a related note, why is this tagged as a fighter feat (not feat type, balance level)? --DanielDraco 16:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Because it brings monks up a tier by giving it some damage dealing options that don't suck. And if you found ways to reduce MAD, you could turn the monk into a fighter level class. At least, that is my understanding of it. --Havvy 22:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Their damage potential remains exactly the same. They can just do it from slightly further away now. --DanielDraco 06:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
