Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spellcutting Strike (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (rating) |
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ==Rating== | + | == Rating == |
{{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux |rating=neither |reason=I like the concept, but the prereqs don't quite work for me. It's keyed off of Mage Slayer, another feat that I sort of like the effect of but not the prereqs. You have to take things you are unlikely to care about the qualify for it, suck at and SLAs you might get in the future, and even then you're just forcing a caster to shift around the field a bit if you get into range. The BAB +12 requirement is weird as well, since the sorts of battlefield control spells this could counter have been online for many levels already. This could be an effective counter to grease or early wall spells, but it's not because you can't take it. So while I want to like it, it's a mixed bag and doesn't get a full thumbs up.}} | {{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux |rating=neither |reason=I like the concept, but the prereqs don't quite work for me. It's keyed off of Mage Slayer, another feat that I sort of like the effect of but not the prereqs. You have to take things you are unlikely to care about the qualify for it, suck at and SLAs you might get in the future, and even then you're just forcing a caster to shift around the field a bit if you get into range. The BAB +12 requirement is weird as well, since the sorts of battlefield control spells this could counter have been online for many levels already. This could be an effective counter to grease or early wall spells, but it's not because you can't take it. So while I want to like it, it's a mixed bag and doesn't get a full thumbs up.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Prereqs == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry, didn't see your PM online before I logged off. That said, I'm open to changing the prereqs if you think they should be lower. Note that Mage Slayer IMO should be replaced with something a little stronger, something like [[Witch_Slayer_(3.5e_Feat)|this]] for example. But yeah, I'm fine changing it if it seems high. It just felt right at the time, since being able to go, "No you" to a mage's limited resources with a similar action seems really powerful. But if you think lowering the reqs would be a good idea I'd be fine with that. Something like 6 BAB? And should [[Spell_Parry_(3.5e_Feat)|these]] [[Spell_Reflection_(3.5e_Feat)|two]] feats also have the same prereqs lowered? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 07:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 11 December 2011
Rating
|
Tarkisflux is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I like the concept, but the prereqs don't quite work for me. It's keyed off of Mage Slayer, another feat that I sort of like the effect of but not the prereqs. You have to take things you are unlikely to care about the qualify for it, suck at and SLAs you might get in the future, and even then you're just forcing a caster to shift around the field a bit if you get into range. The BAB +12 requirement is weird as well, since the sorts of battlefield control spells this could counter have been online for many levels already. This could be an effective counter to grease or early wall spells, but it's not because you can't take it. So while I want to like it, it's a mixed bag and doesn't get a full thumbs up. |
Prereqs
Sorry, didn't see your PM online before I logged off. That said, I'm open to changing the prereqs if you think they should be lower. Note that Mage Slayer IMO should be replaced with something a little stronger, something like this for example. But yeah, I'm fine changing it if it seems high. It just felt right at the time, since being able to go, "No you" to a mage's limited resources with a similar action seems really powerful. But if you think lowering the reqs would be a good idea I'd be fine with that. Something like 6 BAB? And should these two feats also have the same prereqs lowered? --Ghostwheel 07:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
