Talk:Manu (3.5e Race)

Ratings

	Halian opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	Don't... just don't replace humans. And especially don't replace them with something more powerful.

	Ghostwheel dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	If this is allowed in a campaign, it makes humans redundant. Seeing as they're one of the best races around, that makes this an overpowered, and thus bad, race.

Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.

With +2 Intelligence and -2 Charisma or Strength (whichever is irrelevant), this even has the skills of a Human. The Human is a perfectly decent cornerstone race, so I disapprove of making something to simply replace it. Instinctive Emotion makes this race amusing, although I worry that a situational disadvantage is really awkward for balance: whether or not it matters depends almost entirely on what your opponents know.

Also, casters for the most part don't care. --Ghostwheel 05:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

	Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	Same reason as UK. Except I like it instead of disliking it. Happyface.

	Undead Knave dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	This is a human that is easier to minmax with. Sadface.

Changes

I made them a -2 total, and upped the Hotblood to 50%. Wat think? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

You're a wizard, Harry; take -2 to str and cha and +2 to int. You still don't care. --Ghostwheel (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Doublechecking

Given some of the ratings, I'm wondering if you are aware the ability scores are +2, -2, -2? I don't think the "they are humans" things still applies. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

But you're a wizard, Harry! --Ghostwheel (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)