Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gravity Warrior (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
(→Something is missing. . .) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|reason=Mess with a primary force of nature, and control the movement of the field. Fun and powerful. | |reason=Mess with a primary force of nature, and control the movement of the field. Fun and powerful. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Something is missing. . . == | ||
| + | |||
| + | It happens to be Strengthened Defense and Gravity Blade. Either those shouldnt be there, or the abilities never showed up, but they are only found within the table. Some clarification please? - [[User:Kylem2013|Kylem2013]] ([[User talk:Kylem2013|talk]]) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, and by the table, Weighted Attack would seem in the wrong place, since you dont first get it until 13th level. As a note. - [[User:Kylem2013|Kylem2013]] ([[User talk:Kylem2013|talk]]) 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :An anonymous user edited the mechanics of the class. I reverted it back, which fixes those problems (also removing the abilities, some of which were pretty neat). Hopefully if the IP user comes by again, they will make a variant version, which I'll help format nicely. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 18:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:54, 11 March 2014
|
Havvy likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Mess with a primary force of nature, and control the movement of the field. Fun and powerful. |
Something is missing. . .[edit]
It happens to be Strengthened Defense and Gravity Blade. Either those shouldnt be there, or the abilities never showed up, but they are only found within the table. Some clarification please? - Kylem2013 (talk) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oh, and by the table, Weighted Attack would seem in the wrong place, since you dont first get it until 13th level. As a note. - Kylem2013 (talk) 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- An anonymous user edited the mechanics of the class. I reverted it back, which fixes those problems (also removing the abilities, some of which were pretty neat). Hopefully if the IP user comes by again, they will make a variant version, which I'll help format nicely. --Aarnott (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
