Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greater Sneak Attack (3.5e Maneuver)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (Text replace - "|rating=hate" to "|rating=oppose") |
(Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=Now that this is redundant with "Rogue Training" with my last edit, I strongly suggest carpet bombing this into the ground. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Surgo | {{Rating |rater=Surgo | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
Revision as of 08:21, 23 March 2014
Ratings
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Now that this is redundant with "Rogue Training" with my last edit, I strongly suggest carpet bombing this into the ground. |
|
|
Surgo opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Various ways for Rogues to pick this up, completely breaks the RNG. |
How is this more RNG-breaking than a Swift action attack? --Foxwarrior 00:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- It implies every attack has SA doubled. --Aarnott 00:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Do Boosts have an implicit duration? The poorly written rules text seems to me to be implying a duration of 1 attack. --Foxwarrior 00:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
