Difference between revisions of "Talk:Subtle Cut (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) |
(→Oh RAW...) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Semantics aside, calling it overpowered is weird and confusing. Are you arguing that this is a case of overpowered for VH (extremely relevant) or simply restating the opinion that VH is overpowered (irrelevant aside from preference)? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | :Semantics aside, calling it overpowered is weird and confusing. Are you arguing that this is a case of overpowered for VH (extremely relevant) or simply restating the opinion that VH is overpowered (irrelevant aside from preference)? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The former. Falls into the unofficial ''planar shepard'' level for me. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 01:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 20 May 2014
Oh RAW...
Ignoring the fact this is typical overpowered Frank & K tripe, I noticed something funny.
+0: Any time you damage an opponent, that damage is increased by 1.
As worded, you hit something and your damage is permanently increased by 1. It probably was meant to be +1 damage in general, or +1 scaling damage vs one opponent, but nope... 1 extra damage every attack, no duration. The el oh els. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 07:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the "that" there makes the object of your damage increase a specific instance of damage, not all damage ever, which would prevent the runaway increase you're referring to. I should run that sentence by one of my English grad friends though.
- Semantics aside, calling it overpowered is weird and confusing. Are you arguing that this is a case of overpowered for VH (extremely relevant) or simply restating the opinion that VH is overpowered (irrelevant aside from preference)? - Tarkisflux Talk 21:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
