Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adorable (3.5e Equipment)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(uuh)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:It's intentional.  You trade +1 AC (from enhancement) for +2 AC against a more limited set of creatures.  Evil creatures (common) and things immune to morale effects (anything mindless, so many Undead and Constructs) will ignore it.  The skill bonus was mostly gravy. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 03:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:It's intentional.  You trade +1 AC (from enhancement) for +2 AC against a more limited set of creatures.  Evil creatures (common) and things immune to morale effects (anything mindless, so many Undead and Constructs) will ignore it.  The skill bonus was mostly gravy. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 03:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::The skill bonus is untyped, and stacks with all of the other ridiculous item boosters out there. Was that intentional? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup>  04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:05, 14 October 2014

uuh

>Adorable may be taken multiple times, the bonuses stacking.

I can't think of any way this could possibly be abused. +2 ac versus a fucktonne of creatures and a infinitely stacking +2 to diplomacy? It's the most balanced thing I've ever seen. Fluffykittens (talk) 02:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

It's intentional. You trade +1 AC (from enhancement) for +2 AC against a more limited set of creatures. Evil creatures (common) and things immune to morale effects (anything mindless, so many Undead and Constructs) will ignore it. The skill bonus was mostly gravy. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
The skill bonus is untyped, and stacks with all of the other ridiculous item boosters out there. Was that intentional? - Tarkisflux Talk 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
FavoredFluffykittens +
LikedLeziad + and Tarkisflux +
OpposedGhostwheel +