Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adorable (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→uuh) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::The skill bonus is untyped, and stacks with all of the other ridiculous item boosters out there. Was that intentional? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | ::The skill bonus is untyped, and stacks with all of the other ridiculous item boosters out there. Was that intentional? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I suppose I should apply a typing to the skill bonus (since it is intended to stack with itself, but not necessarily other boosters). -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 04:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:21, 14 October 2014
uuh
>Adorable may be taken multiple times, the bonuses stacking.
I can't think of any way this could possibly be abused. +2 ac versus a fucktonne of creatures and a infinitely stacking +2 to diplomacy? It's the most balanced thing I've ever seen. Fluffykittens (talk) 02:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's intentional. You trade +1 AC (from enhancement) for +2 AC against a more limited set of creatures. Evil creatures (common) and things immune to morale effects (anything mindless, so many Undead and Constructs) will ignore it. The skill bonus was mostly gravy. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- The skill bonus is untyped, and stacks with all of the other ridiculous item boosters out there. Was that intentional? - Tarkisflux Talk 04:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
