Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gullible (3.5e Flaw)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
TheDarkWad (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Shouldn't the CL be equal to HD of the person suggesting things to you? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 14:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | : Shouldn't the CL be equal to HD of the person suggesting things to you? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 14:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I am hesitating between the two, creature's HD vary a lot. So it make the suggestion of a cunning devil way less effective than say, some talking animal. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 16:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Caster level equal to speaker's charisma bonus, minimum 1. [[User:LenKagetsu|LenKagetsu]] ([[User talk:LenKagetsu|talk]]) 18:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: Alternatively I could do speaker's rank in bluff (minimum 1) or is that too much bookkeeping? --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 18:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::: Too much book-keeping IMO. Ultimately, it's only for SR and dispelling. Heck, with the current flavor of the flaw, I'd make it an extraordinary effect and be done with it. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 19:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::: If you make it extraordinary, no caster level means you have to specify duration.--[[User:TheDarkWad|TheDarkWad]] ([[User talk:TheDarkWad|talk]]) 02:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:13, 6 September 2015
What is the caster level for the suggestion effect?--TheDarkWad (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the CL be equal to HD of the person suggesting things to you? --Ghostwheel (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Caster level equal to speaker's charisma bonus, minimum 1. LenKagetsu (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Too much book-keeping IMO. Ultimately, it's only for SR and dispelling. Heck, with the current flavor of the flaw, I'd make it an extraordinary effect and be done with it. --Ghostwheel (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you make it extraordinary, no caster level means you have to specify duration.--TheDarkWad (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
