Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage (3.5e Feat)"

Revision as of 01:44, 2 November 2017

	Zhenra-Khal dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	Echoing everybody else's rating, +6 is too much. It would be different if it scaled (Like +1 per 3 or 4 levels in a Rage-granting class), but you can literally take this at 1st level and get a free +6 to hit. Other than the large bonus, I don't dislike the feat at all. It's just... Broken, in that one bit.

	Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	The name sounded cool, but it just a ridiculous number boost.

	ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	I have to agree with UK and GW here, especially given that the Barbarian already has a bonus to attack rolls from the bonus Strength provided by raging. This is just a straight vertical boost to that, before you even get into the fact that +6 is simply a huge ability to break the RNG.

	Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	+6 is a ridiculously high number.

	Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	+6 almost makes you fall off the RNG all by itself. This is way too strong for even high-level, and is a huge boost in vertical power for any sort of barbarian.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Ratings ==
+{{Rating |rater=Zhenra-Khal
+|rating=dislike
+|reason=Echoing everybody else's rating, +6 is too much. It would be different if it scaled (Like +1 per 3 or 4 levels in a Rage-granting class), but you can literally take this at 1st level and get a free +6 to hit. Other than the large bonus, I don't dislike the feat at all. It's just... Broken, in that one bit.
+}}
 {{Rating |rater=Leziad
 |rating=oppose