User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage (3.5e Feat)

Ratings

	HB Forged is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
	I don't see why this feat shouldn't exist. I mean, sure, barbarians are great up close. However, the class NEEDS ranged options, & better access TO such options, not WORSE access. Overall, 2 out of 4. Not high enough to seem like I love it (not that I like it), but high enough to keep it from being blammed.

	Zhenra-Khal dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	Echoing everybody else's rating, +6 is too much. It would be different if it scaled (Like +1 per 3 or 4 levels in a Rage-granting class), but you can literally take this at 1st level and get a free +6 to hit. Other than the large bonus, I don't dislike the feat at all. It's just... Broken, in that one bit.

	Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	The name sounded cool, but it just a ridiculous number boost.

	ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	I have to agree with UK and GW here, especially given that the Barbarian already has a bonus to attack rolls from the bonus Strength provided by raging. This is just a straight vertical boost to that, before you even get into the fact that +6 is simply a huge ability to break the RNG.

	Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	+6 is a ridiculously high number.

	Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	+6 almost makes you fall off the RNG all by itself. This is way too strong for even high-level, and is a huge boost in vertical power for any sort of barbarian.