Difference between revisions of "Talk:Specialized Heavy Ray (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
(→Damage Dice: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'd just add to both spells a clause that specify that the damage is physical in natura, otherwise it wouldn't interact with DR/any metal | I'd just add to both spells a clause that specify that the damage is physical in natura, otherwise it wouldn't interact with DR/any metal | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Damage Dice == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This goes for this spell and it predecessor. Are you certain about having disintegrate-tier damage on a AoE-line [[Reflex]] save is a good idea? That and d12s are notably swingy. I am curious about why you went with this damage dice, especially at moderate level. PS: Also you need to list the cost of the ingots, only mithral is calculated by weight I believe. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 16:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 28 April 2022
Ratings
|
The bluez in the dungeon favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| I nice follow-up to your heavy ray spell
I'd just add to both spells a clause that specify that the damage is physical in natura, otherwise it wouldn't interact with DR/any metal |
Damage Dice
This goes for this spell and it predecessor. Are you certain about having disintegrate-tier damage on a AoE-line Reflex save is a good idea? That and d12s are notably swingy. I am curious about why you went with this damage dice, especially at moderate level. PS: Also you need to list the cost of the ingots, only mithral is calculated by weight I believe. --Leziad (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
