Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greater Sneak Attack (3.5e Maneuver)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→Ratings) |
(→Ratings) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Leziad | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=It badly written to say the least. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=Now that this is redundant with "Rogue Training" with my last edit, I strongly suggest carpet bombing this into the ground. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Surgo | {{Rating |rater=Surgo | ||
| − | |rating= | + | |rating=oppose |
|reason=Various ways for Rogues to pick this up, completely breaks the RNG. | |reason=Various ways for Rogues to pick this up, completely breaks the RNG. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Renshae | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=This can be bonkers damage. Completely broken despite many high-level creatures being immune to sneak attack. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 22: | ||
::Do Boosts have an implicit duration? The poorly written rules text seems to me to be implying a duration of 1 attack. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] 00:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC) | ::Do Boosts have an implicit duration? The poorly written rules text seems to me to be implying a duration of 1 attack. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] 00:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::There are definitely Boosts which last until the end of your turn, such as Girallon Windmill Flesh Rip. Without a specified duration, we're left to infer it from the text, which does indeed sound like the rest of your turn. [[User:Renshae|Renshae]] ([[User talk:Renshae|talk]]) 05:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 26 July 2023
Ratings[edit]
|
Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It badly written to say the least. |
|
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Now that this is redundant with "Rogue Training" with my last edit, I strongly suggest carpet bombing this into the ground. |
|
|
Surgo opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Various ways for Rogues to pick this up, completely breaks the RNG. |
|
|
Renshae opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| This can be bonkers damage. Completely broken despite many high-level creatures being immune to sneak attack. |
How is this more RNG-breaking than a Swift action attack? --Foxwarrior 00:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- It implies every attack has SA doubled. --Aarnott 00:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Do Boosts have an implicit duration? The poorly written rules text seems to me to be implying a duration of 1 attack. --Foxwarrior 00:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
