Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cavalry Saber (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (Leziad moved page Talk:Cavalry Sword (3.5e Equipment) to Talk:Cavalry Sabre (3.5e Equipment) without leaving a redirect) |
m (Leziad moved page Talk:Cavalry Sabre (3.5e Equipment) to Talk:Cavalry Saber (3.5e Equipment)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Zarathustra21 | ||
| + | |rating=favor | ||
| + | |reason=well, good! there are also a less refined and usually cheaper variant of this weapon type, for example some more "slashing"-oriented "riding sword" such as the straight-bladed "Pallash" and some exemplar of the "Spadroon" and many exemplars of the "Szabla"; there are also other less refined and usually cheaper more "thrusting" (piercing) oriented riding sword such as some "Mortuary Swords" and "Waloon Swords"; the latter, however, sometimes falls into the "Dueling Saber" or "Reitscwhert" type. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Soslan19 | ||
| + | |rating=favor | ||
| + | |reason=It makes sense; typically every weapon in 3.5 manuals has proper unique charachteristics in terms of attack roll, damage and critical, but the cavalry saber is a weapon that can work. It offers the basis ofa longsword with an extra advantage in use for those having the Exotic Weapon Proficiency and Weapon Finesse. All of this is balanced since the weapon costs more: it isn't a masterwork weapon yet but the sxtra amount of money reflects a partucularly advanced level in the weapon's technology. This Cavalry Saber is basicaly a form of "definitive weapon's form" for its kind, it means it is an excellent model within the family of the "Longsword-type weapons". Many Hibrids are possible to be made with basically every kind of weapon, since every creation is possible in D&D, the charachteristics of everything can be put toghether, if it makes sense and follows the logic. Under these conditions, every is fine, perfect, and complete, now. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
|rating=like | |rating=like | ||
Latest revision as of 07:57, 17 August 2024
Ratings[edit]
|
Zarathustra21 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| well, good! there are also a less refined and usually cheaper variant of this weapon type, for example some more "slashing"-oriented "riding sword" such as the straight-bladed "Pallash" and some exemplar of the "Spadroon" and many exemplars of the "Szabla"; there are also other less refined and usually cheaper more "thrusting" (piercing) oriented riding sword such as some "Mortuary Swords" and "Waloon Swords"; the latter, however, sometimes falls into the "Dueling Saber" or "Reitscwhert" type. |
|
|
Soslan19 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| It makes sense; typically every weapon in 3.5 manuals has proper unique charachteristics in terms of attack roll, damage and critical, but the cavalry saber is a weapon that can work. It offers the basis ofa longsword with an extra advantage in use for those having the Exotic Weapon Proficiency and Weapon Finesse. All of this is balanced since the weapon costs more: it isn't a masterwork weapon yet but the sxtra amount of money reflects a partucularly advanced level in the weapon's technology. This Cavalry Saber is basicaly a form of "definitive weapon's form" for its kind, it means it is an excellent model within the family of the "Longsword-type weapons". Many Hibrids are possible to be made with basically every kind of weapon, since every creation is possible in D&D, the charachteristics of everything can be put toghether, if it makes sense and follows the logic. Under these conditions, every is fine, perfect, and complete, now. |
|
Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A good mounted weapon besides the lance? Good! |
|
Undead Knave is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Acceptable, but there maybe should be a bit more in the way of text. Just sayin'. |
