Difference between revisions of "Talk:Steelix (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Quantumboost (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:And - I'm hesitant to outright give it fire vulnerability; you can check the Bulbasaur page for prior discussion about this. Scizor and Gyarados have the whole "take double damage from X type of energy", yeah, but they have 4x effectiveness in the games. And even then it's usually "-10 to saves". | :And - I'm hesitant to outright give it fire vulnerability; you can check the Bulbasaur page for prior discussion about this. Scizor and Gyarados have the whole "take double damage from X type of energy", yeah, but they have 4x effectiveness in the games. And even then it's usually "-10 to saves". | ||
:I expect to write up Paras/Parasect at some point, and they'll definitely have something along those lines; I expect that anything with 4x weakness to an actual D&D energy type should get the same. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 17:19, March 21, 2010 (UTC) | :I expect to write up Paras/Parasect at some point, and they'll definitely have something along those lines; I expect that anything with 4x weakness to an actual D&D energy type should get the same. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 17:19, March 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::why dr/wood? i thought steel-type made it not take the extra damage from plant? also i'd use [[SRD:Vulnerability to Energy]] for vulnerability in general. its an extra half damage fail or pass. double damage and -10 to saves is 3.0(?)(i think)--[[User:NameViolation|NameViolation]] 18:35, March 21, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:35, 21 March 2010
damage should be 2d8 +22, not 18. and shouldn't it have fire vulnerability, since its a steel type pokemon and fire pwns them--NameViolation 05:59, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Not surprising, it looked like that wasn't changed between the two. Fixed.
- And - I'm hesitant to outright give it fire vulnerability; you can check the Bulbasaur page for prior discussion about this. Scizor and Gyarados have the whole "take double damage from X type of energy", yeah, but they have 4x effectiveness in the games. And even then it's usually "-10 to saves".
- I expect to write up Paras/Parasect at some point, and they'll definitely have something along those lines; I expect that anything with 4x weakness to an actual D&D energy type should get the same. --Quantumboost 17:19, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
- why dr/wood? i thought steel-type made it not take the extra damage from plant? also i'd use SRD:Vulnerability to Energy for vulnerability in general. its an extra half damage fail or pass. double damage and -10 to saves is 3.0(?)(i think)--NameViolation 18:35, March 21, 2010 (UTC)