Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Rain (3.5e Martial Discipline)"
(→Balance) |
m (→Other Weapons) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Would you think this is appropriate to use for ''any'' ranged combatant? For example, bowman or crossbowman? Ignoring the flavor for a moment, do you feel it would still be mechanically balanced for other ranged types? --[[User:Reddir|Be well]] 04:20, April 3, 2010 (UTC) | Would you think this is appropriate to use for ''any'' ranged combatant? For example, bowman or crossbowman? Ignoring the flavor for a moment, do you feel it would still be mechanically balanced for other ranged types? --[[User:Reddir|Be well]] 04:20, April 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maneuvers that do straight damage get a little better, maneuvers that let you do things like reload get a little worse, but the change is negligible and if a discipline is balanced for any weapon of a given reach (putting all ranged weapons here into the same reach - weapons that have short range and thus benefit from Black Rain's line-attack strikes and such are usually weak weapons anyway), it should balanced for every weapon of the same reach. - [[User:Viatos|Viatos]] 04:24, April 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Balance == | == Balance == | ||
Revision as of 04:24, 16 April 2010
Other Weapons
Would you think this is appropriate to use for any ranged combatant? For example, bowman or crossbowman? Ignoring the flavor for a moment, do you feel it would still be mechanically balanced for other ranged types? --Be well 04:20, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Maneuvers that do straight damage get a little better, maneuvers that let you do things like reload get a little worse, but the change is negligible and if a discipline is balanced for any weapon of a given reach (putting all ranged weapons here into the same reach - weapons that have short range and thus benefit from Black Rain's line-attack strikes and such are usually weak weapons anyway), it should balanced for every weapon of the same reach. - Viatos 04:24, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
Balance
Why is this fighter-level? Seems more rogue-level to me. --Ghostwheel 03:20, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone disagree with changing this to rogue-level? --Ghostwheel 00:43, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
- It looks rogue to me. That, and it is awesome. --Andrew Arnott (talk, email) 00:47, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
