Difference between revisions of "Talk:Special Attachment (3.5e Flaw)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
The Badger (talk | contribs) (→Bad Flaw) |
(→Bad Flaw) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:You can even pull this off as a sorcerer. You think a dagger is your magical weapon. No thief is (realistically) going to steal a mundane dagger off a sorcerer, and since he never uses it in combat, it'll never get sundered/broken/lost. This requires a DM to intentionally do something that makes no sense(have a thief steal a 2gp dagger rather than a 2500gp longsword, or a half-full spellbook) to have any penalty. Finally, any DM that does steal the sorcerer's dagger takes away ALL HIS POWER for a week. That's not balanced. No DM would do that to a spellcaster more than once, in which case you're getting a free feat for one bad encounter. --[[User:The Badger|The Badger]] 21:43, May 18, 2010 (UTC) | :You can even pull this off as a sorcerer. You think a dagger is your magical weapon. No thief is (realistically) going to steal a mundane dagger off a sorcerer, and since he never uses it in combat, it'll never get sundered/broken/lost. This requires a DM to intentionally do something that makes no sense(have a thief steal a 2gp dagger rather than a 2500gp longsword, or a half-full spellbook) to have any penalty. Finally, any DM that does steal the sorcerer's dagger takes away ALL HIS POWER for a week. That's not balanced. No DM would do that to a spellcaster more than once, in which case you're getting a free feat for one bad encounter. --[[User:The Badger|The Badger]] 21:43, May 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I was originally going to have this flaw require the item be in your hand or worn on your person at all times and have loss or destruction result in a comatose state, but I thought I had enough of a reputation as a sadist as it was. Besides, I do like the idea of a magical being who refuses to accept his power is his own.--[[User:Teh Storm|Teh Storm]] 05:53, May 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:53, 19 May 2010
Bad Flaw
- Be a tiefling
- Be a martial class
- Ignore the flaw
- Lose darkness
- Don't care
This flaw isn't a very good one, nor does it penalize all characters equally. --Ghostwheel 21:26, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- You can even pull this off as a sorcerer. You think a dagger is your magical weapon. No thief is (realistically) going to steal a mundane dagger off a sorcerer, and since he never uses it in combat, it'll never get sundered/broken/lost. This requires a DM to intentionally do something that makes no sense(have a thief steal a 2gp dagger rather than a 2500gp longsword, or a half-full spellbook) to have any penalty. Finally, any DM that does steal the sorcerer's dagger takes away ALL HIS POWER for a week. That's not balanced. No DM would do that to a spellcaster more than once, in which case you're getting a free feat for one bad encounter. --The Badger 21:43, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
- I was originally going to have this flaw require the item be in your hand or worn on your person at all times and have loss or destruction result in a comatose state, but I thought I had enough of a reputation as a sadist as it was. Besides, I do like the idea of a magical being who refuses to accept his power is his own.--Teh Storm 05:53, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
