Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spellburke (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (Created page with "== My comments == While this is a good idea that I support (an inverse ''spell immunity'', essentially), it is far overlevelled for what it does. This is a 4th level spell, 5th ...") |
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
While this is a good idea that I support (an inverse ''spell immunity'', essentially), it is far overlevelled for what it does. This is a 4th level spell, 5th level at most. I will rate after you address this. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 19:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | While this is a good idea that I support (an inverse ''spell immunity'', essentially), it is far overlevelled for what it does. This is a 4th level spell, 5th level at most. I will rate after you address this. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 19:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It is now 4th-level. --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] 22:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux | ||
| + | |rating=love | ||
| + | |reason=This is a solid debuff for the level that pushes you to make some potentially interesting strategic decisions. I really like it. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Rating|rater=MisterSinister|rating=like|reason=See above, basically.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:13, 13 September 2012
My comments[edit]
While this is a good idea that I support (an inverse spell immunity, essentially), it is far overlevelled for what it does. This is a 4th level spell, 5th level at most. I will rate after you address this. - MisterSinister 19:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is now 4th-level. --Sulacu 22:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Ratings[edit]
|
Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| This is a solid debuff for the level that pushes you to make some potentially interesting strategic decisions. I really like it. |
|
MisterSinister likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| See above, basically. |
