Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gravity Warrior (3.5e Class)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Something is missing. . .)
(Something is missing. . .)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
It happens to be Strengthened Defense and Gravity Blade. Either those shouldnt be there, or the abilities never showed up, but they are only found within the table. Some clarification please? - [[User:Kylem2013|Kylem2013]] ([[User talk:Kylem2013|talk]]) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 
It happens to be Strengthened Defense and Gravity Blade. Either those shouldnt be there, or the abilities never showed up, but they are only found within the table. Some clarification please? - [[User:Kylem2013|Kylem2013]] ([[User talk:Kylem2013|talk]]) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
Oh, and by the table, Weighted Attack would seem in the wrong place, since you dont first get it until 13th level. As a note. - [[User:Kylem2013|Kylem2013]] ([[User talk:Kylem2013|talk]]) 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:An anonymous user edited the mechanics of the class. I reverted it back, which fixes those problems (also removing the abilities, some of which were pretty neat). Hopefully if the IP user comes by again, they will make a variant version, which I'll help format nicely. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] ([[User talk:Aarnott|talk]]) 18:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:54, 11 March 2014

RatedLike.png Havvy likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
Mess with a primary force of nature, and control the movement of the field. Fun and powerful.


Something is missing. . .[edit]

It happens to be Strengthened Defense and Gravity Blade. Either those shouldnt be there, or the abilities never showed up, but they are only found within the table. Some clarification please? - Kylem2013 (talk) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh, and by the table, Weighted Attack would seem in the wrong place, since you dont first get it until 13th level. As a note. - Kylem2013 (talk) 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

An anonymous user edited the mechanics of the class. I reverted it back, which fixes those problems (also removing the abilities, some of which were pretty neat). Hopefully if the IP user comes by again, they will make a variant version, which I'll help format nicely. --Aarnott (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)