Difference between revisions of "Talk:Touch of Health (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm not entirely sure it's Low. I am willing to be swayed. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2019 (MDT) | I'm not entirely sure it's Low. I am willing to be swayed. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2019 (MDT) | ||
− | Hmm. It might be moderate, but I've always seen Lay on Hands as pretty slim pickings for healing unless you're level one or two. I can change it to Moderate, since the bonus to pre-existing Lay on Hands is also fairly good for a Paladin. --[[User:Locke|Locke]] ([[User talk:Locke|talk]]) 08:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC) | + | :Hmm. It might be moderate, but I've always seen Lay on Hands as pretty slim pickings for healing unless you're level one or two. I can change it to Moderate, since the bonus to pre-existing Lay on Hands is also fairly good for a Paladin. --[[User:Locke|Locke]] ([[User talk:Locke|talk]]) 08:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:56, 12 February 2020
Are you sure it's Low?
While hardly amazing by any standard, Lay on Hands is still useful to have. A full round action isn't a big deal (a 1 round action would be a bigger deal) since using a standard to heal is "you're still not acting this round" anyway. And the no undead harming is a nerf but not really a big one, it's better used as healing anyway.
I'm not entirely sure it's Low. I am willing to be swayed. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 01:49, 21 April 2019 (MDT)