Difference between revisions of "User talk:Saber/Kubikiribocho (3.5e Equipment)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
|reason=Even if this were simply a weapon that was really big, dealt 3d6 base damage at Medium size, and had an 18-20 critical threat range, I would still probably oppose it simply on the grounds that it pretty much outdoes any other weapon ever. Tack on the fact that nothing actually describes what the weapon '''is''' (the text vaguely suggests that it is something like an organism based on the hp), the article is incomplete (there is no mention of proficiency level or whether the weapon is one or two handed; the only thing revealed about its size is that it weighs 30 pounds), and it gives absolutely silly HD-based bonuses with zero justification (I'll give all of these to zombies or bloodhulks to abuse their high HD totals at low CR) and I definitely give it an Oppose. | |reason=Even if this were simply a weapon that was really big, dealt 3d6 base damage at Medium size, and had an 18-20 critical threat range, I would still probably oppose it simply on the grounds that it pretty much outdoes any other weapon ever. Tack on the fact that nothing actually describes what the weapon '''is''' (the text vaguely suggests that it is something like an organism based on the hp), the article is incomplete (there is no mention of proficiency level or whether the weapon is one or two handed; the only thing revealed about its size is that it weighs 30 pounds), and it gives absolutely silly HD-based bonuses with zero justification (I'll give all of these to zombies or bloodhulks to abuse their high HD totals at low CR) and I definitely give it an Oppose. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Rating | ||
| + | |rater=Havvy | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=What Cid said. This flies in the face of balance. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 01:45, 10 June 2013
Ratings
|
ThunderGod Cid opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Even if this were simply a weapon that was really big, dealt 3d6 base damage at Medium size, and had an 18-20 critical threat range, I would still probably oppose it simply on the grounds that it pretty much outdoes any other weapon ever. Tack on the fact that nothing actually describes what the weapon is (the text vaguely suggests that it is something like an organism based on the hp), the article is incomplete (there is no mention of proficiency level or whether the weapon is one or two handed; the only thing revealed about its size is that it weighs 30 pounds), and it gives absolutely silly HD-based bonuses with zero justification (I'll give all of these to zombies or bloodhulks to abuse their high HD totals at low CR) and I definitely give it an Oppose. |
|
|
Havvy opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| What Cid said. This flies in the face of balance. |
