User talk:Azya/Ono (3.5e Equipment)

RatingsEdit

	Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	3d4 damage, lolwut? Does a large become 3d5? Pretty dumb.

	Fluffykittens opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	It's a greataxe that deals one more point of damage on average. Not worth an entire entry of its own.

	Eiji-kun dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	The stats themselves, while bland, aren't terrible save one thing that bumps this from neutral to dislike: 3d4 is superior to 1d12 when it comes to averages. Not my much (hence dislike, not hate) but yeah, not really that good here.

	Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	It's stronger than a Greatsword, which was the best weapon, and strictly better than the Greataxe. It has no attributes that make it interesting, either.

	Quey opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	As mentioned by other in the discussion, this weapon is a better version of others with no drawbacks, nor a real reason for it. It also mentions warrior monks, but it isn't a monk weapon.

Damage

Do you realize that this weapon is stronger than the Greatsword, which is already the strongest two-handed martial weapon? Also, d3s are annoying. --Foxwarrior 21:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Why would anyone EVER choose a greataxe over a ono? I could understand if there were some difference in cost... it just seem that this weapon make taking a greataxe reluctant. You should rethink maybe a few aspects of the weapon, to make it an equivalent choice. --Leziad 18:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)