Talk:Aquiter Kobolds (3.5e Race)

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Revision as of 17:56, 21 July 2012 by Ganteka Future (talk | contribs) (updated rating)
Jump to: navigation, search

Formatting Update

I'd be willing to help out in updating some of the formatting and such for your pages, Eiji. Linking in the Racial Traits section would be nice. Let me know if you want some of that action and I'll try to get to it when I have a spare bit of time here and there. I know it's not your favorite thing. --Ganteka Future 05:23, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Ratings

RatedDislike.png Ganteka Future dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
Good race. Thought out, but lacking in a few areas (Alignment and Language in particular) and it feels like it could be expanded upon in tasty detail. While I wouldn't let formatting hold back a good article (or lack of a picture), I will mention that every little bit helps. As is, its solid, and warrants a favor.

I don't know what I was thinking back with my old rating, but this race stinks, even for a kobold. That sounded a bit racist, but whatever. The flavor text is rather sparse, offering nothing particularly new, interesting or entertaining. Improvements in wording and sentence structure would help a lot with an update. As for mechanics, bleh. Small and Natural Armor is a bit much. Light Sensitivity is lame (as mentioned below). Natural weapons are not cool for an LA0 race. They seem unusually small for a Small race. This one needs some work.

Template:RC Favor

Eiji is looking and reviewing this, it is an old article after all. Changes may occur. -- Eiji-kun 12:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Light Sensitivity?

When I read the summary I thought "cool, a Kobold without Light Sensitivity!"

If they are adjusted to life outside of caves, wouldn't they not be bothered by sunlight? The Dire Reverend