Talk:Manu (3.5e Race)
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ratings
![]() |
Halian opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
---|---|
Don't... just don't replace humans. And especially don't replace them with something more powerful. |
![]() |
Ghostwheel dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
---|---|
If this is allowed in a campaign, it makes humans redundant. Seeing as they're one of the best races around, that makes this an overpowered, and thus bad, race. |
![]() |
Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
---|---|
Instinctive Emotion makes this race amusing, although I worry that a situational disadvantage is really awkward for balance: whether or not it matters depends almost entirely on what your opponents know. |
- Also, casters for the most part don't care. --Ghostwheel 05:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Leziad likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
---|---|
Same reason as UK. Except I like it instead of disliking it. Happyface. |
![]() |
Undead Knave dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4. |
---|---|
This is a human that is easier to minmax with. Sadface. |
Changes
I made them a -2 total, and upped the Hotblood to 50%. Wat think? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- You're a wizard, Harry; take -2 to str and cha and +2 to int. You still don't care. --Ghostwheel (talk) 16:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Doublechecking
Given some of the ratings, I'm wondering if you are aware the ability scores are +2, -2, -2? I don't think the "they are humans" things still applies. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- But you're a wizard, Harry! --Ghostwheel (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)