Talk:Everlasting (3.5e Subtype)

So...CR adjustment? Surely, this isn't a base race. -SecondDeath777 27 February 2018

It's a subtype. Like Living Construct. --68.115.21.14 12:59, 27 February 2018 (MST)

I see. What of? -SecondDeath777 28 February 2018

Edit:Because, you see, Living Construct is both a subtype and a supertype. Living constructs are a kind of construct, and something like a Warforged is a kind of living construct. But the term subtype implies it's a subordinate classification. So who's big daddy? Outsider? Oh, and that aside, I guess I'd just want to know how to make one. Their traits are rather...valuable. Only one currently exists, and it's an individual, not a species, so I'd like Leziad to give me the over-under on how much tougher these traits make a creature.

Yeah but you can't just add Everlasting to an existing creature, it already accounted for in creatures with the subtype as they are built. If a template added Everlasting to a creature then yes, there would be a CR increase. --Leziad (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2018 (MST)

I will re-tool the subtype a bit, but it was meant to be for unique creatures only. I think I will change that and make some change to it as well.

I mean, I getcha, they're kinda like an organization, not dissimilar to my Peace Lords (I have not made this content on the site, don't look for it), but if one were to replicate their immaculate badassery, what power bump might it entail? - SecondDeath777 28 February 2018

Well they are meant to be outsider, so I assume like... +2 or +3 CR? I mean they have better HD, immunities, Immortality and Pathfinder feat. If you use scaling benefits of Pathfinder then it probably just CR +2. An Everlasting Solar would be very threatening by example, an Everlasting Imp... not so much. --Leziad (talk) 06:58, 28 February 2018 (MST)

I see. Yeah, struck me as being around there. Thanks. -SecondDeath777 28 February 2018