Talk:Undead Stalker (3.5e Class)

Rating

	Franken Kesey likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	It's a paladin, ranger, and rogue! The paladin and ranger have always needed help increasing power. The rogue has never needed more power, but giving them a spell list is nice. Well done!

Comments

There are two major issues with this:

1. Since this is the best of all three, it compounds in power. Thus it has no chance of being moderate, but could be high. It has the same sneak attack progression as a rogue, which should be reduced to even keep it at High.
2. The ability to compound the already powerful sneak attack with favored enemy, plus spells makes this Very High balance. Having both features is OK, but they should either not compound or sneak attack progression should be reduced (i.e., +1d6 every four levels).

Overall a fantastic idea though, there is crossover with paladin and ranger, one having a defensive focus and the other offensive.--Franken Kesey 19:14, 6 April 2019 (MDT)

Balanced changed. The-Marksman (talk) 11:52, 8 April 2019 (MDT)

Sidenote: Combining weaker classes inspired the Wildknife, also very high.--Franken Kesey 11:20, 8 April 2019 (MDT)

Does the favored enemy and sneak attack stack?--Franken Kesey 12:09, 8 April 2019 (MDT)

In the same attack, yes, but the favored enemy damage is not multiplied in a critical hit. I'll put a note about that. Thanks for bringing it up. The-Marksman (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2019 (MDT)

Adding a quick summary of the class at the top would be good.--Franken Kesey 17:35, 29 April 2019 (MDT)