Difference between revisions of "Talk:Christmas Elves (3.5e Race)"
m (→I Took A Look: Responding) |
m (→Type) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Type== | ==Type== | ||
| − | Wouldn't it make more sense for these to be a type of Fey? Surely they are not elves in the | + | Wouldn't it make more sense for these to be a type of Fey? Surely they are not elves in the Gygaxian notion of elves. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] 10:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:29, 29 December 2010
I Took A Look
I did some proofing, mostly some sentence structure stuff here and there. View the history if you care to see exactly what. Keep in mind that races are lower case (like orc, human, elf, centaur, cactus, cactaur). I'm still not sure how I feel about the racial traits. A few things are nagging at me, and I'm having a tough time figuring out what exactly and why. I'll have to get back to you on that later some time. Though, if you would, Aelaris, could you provide a mission statement with the goal you were aiming for in their use (like, the class roles they are suited for and such)? --Ganteka Future 20:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Were these intended primarily to be funny? If not, I sincerely apologize for this, and hope that no hard feeling come across. --Change=Chaos. Period. SC 08:05, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Added a usage section. As for Spazal's question, I intended them to be more wholesomely goodly and idealistic than funny, exactly. ...And subverting that horribly is wonderful.
Type
Wouldn't it make more sense for these to be a type of Fey? Surely they are not elves in the Gygaxian notion of elves. --Havvy 10:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
